{"id":8035,"date":"2022-04-18T14:23:04","date_gmt":"2022-04-18T14:23:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/?p=8035"},"modified":"2022-06-07T14:26:31","modified_gmt":"2022-06-07T14:26:31","slug":"haak-istanbul-hakim-ve-savci-kararlarinda-agir-hukuk-ihlalleri-var","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/haak-istanbul-hakim-ve-savci-kararlarinda-agir-hukuk-ihlalleri-var\/","title":{"rendered":"HAAK: \u0130stanbul Hakim ve Savc\u0131 Kararlar\u0131nda A\u011f\u0131r Hukuk \u0130hlalleri Var"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>Almanya K\u00f6ln merkezli olarak kurulan ve temel hak ihlallerinin \u00f6nlenmesi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u00f6nemli faaliyetlere imza atan CrossBorderJurists Derne\u011fi, b\u00fcnyesinde kurdu\u011fu Hukuksuzluklar\u0131 Ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve Analiz Kurulu \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde, hakim, savc\u0131 ve mahkeme kararlar\u0131 ile ma\u011fdur olmu\u015f ki\u015filerin ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 inceleyerek tespitlerini kamuoyu ile payla\u015f\u0131yor.<\/p>\n<p>Son olarak, subay olan ve kimlik bilgileri gizli tutulan Ba\u015fvurucu (47)\u2019nin ba\u015fvurusu ile ilgili de\u011ferlendirmelerine ili\u015fkin raporunu yay\u0131nlad\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>S\u00f6z konusu rapor incelendi\u011finde \u0130stanbul adliyesinde g\u00f6revli Ba\u015fsavc\u0131, savc\u0131, hakim ve mahkeme heyetinin vermi\u015f olduklar\u0131 karar ve i\u015flemlerde a\u011f\u0131r hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar tesipt eden HAAK, bu kararlar nedeniyle ilgili hakim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n insanl\u0131\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7 itham\u0131yla soru\u015fturulmalar\u0131 ve meslekten ihra\u00e7 ile haklar\u0131nda disiplin soru\u015fturulmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti.<\/p>\n<p>Karar metni a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gibidir:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>KARARI\u00a0WORD\u00a0FORMATINDA \u0130ND\u0130RMEK \u0130\u00c7\u0130N TIKLAYINIZ<\/strong>:<a href=\"https:\/\/www.crossborderjurists.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/1.-BASVURUCU-47-KARARI.docx\">BA\u015eVURUCU (47) KARARI<\/a><\/em><br \/>\n<em><strong>KARARIN\u00a0PDF\u00a0FORMATINDA \u0130ND\u0130RMEK \u0130\u00c7\u0130N TIKLAYINIZ<\/strong>:<a href=\"https:\/\/www.crossborderjurists.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/1.-BASVURUCU-47-KARARI.pdf\">BA\u015eVURUCU (47) KARARI<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>CROSSBORDERJURISTS (SINIR A\u015eAN HUKUK\u00c7ULAR) DERNE\u011e\u0130<br \/>\n<\/strong><strong>HUKUKSUZLUKLARI ARA\u015eTIRMA VE ANAL\u0130Z KURULU (HAAK)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>BA\u015eVURUCU (47) KARARI<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Karar Numaras\u0131: 2022\/16<br \/>\nKarar Tarihi: 10.4.2022<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>I. BA\u015eVURU KONUSU<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ba\u015fvurucu Derne\u011fimize ba\u015fvuru yaparak tutukluluk s\u00fcresince hakk\u0131nda verilmi\u015f mahkeme ve h\u00e2kimlik kararlar\u0131 ile savc\u0131l\u0131k taleplerinin incelenmesini, hukuka uygun olup olmad\u0131klar\u0131 konusunda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirilmesini ve bu kararlar\u0131 veren h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n ceza, tazminat ve disiplin hukuku \u00e7er\u00e7evesindeki sorumluluklar\u0131 konusunda kanaatimizi i\u00e7eren bir rapor d\u00fczenlenmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Ba\u015fvurucu kimlik bilgilerinin sakl\u0131 tutulmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. BA\u015eVURUCUNUN TUTUKLULUK S\u00dcREC\u0130NDE VER\u0130LEN KARARLAR VE KARAR VEREN YARGI MENSUPLARI<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u0130DD\u0130ANAME HAZIRLAMA \u00d6NCES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Tutuklama Talep Eden Savc\u0131(l\u0131k):<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u0130stanbul Savc\u0131s\u0131 (<strong>Erg\u00fcn G\u00dc\u00c7L\u00dc<\/strong>\u2013 109889)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Tutuklama ve\/ya Adli Kontrol Karar\u0131 Veren H\u00e2kim\/lik:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u0130stanbul Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi (H\u00e2kim\u00a0<strong>\u00d6mer Harun \u00d6ZBEK<\/strong>\u2013 120920)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Tutuklamaya Konu Su\u00e7lama(lar):<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00dcyeli\u011fi<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Tutuklama Karar\u0131nda Dayanak Olarak Kullan\u0131lan Veriler:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>M\u0130T Bylock tespit raporu<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>\u0130DD\u0130\u0130ANAME HAZIRLANMA SONRASI<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u0130ddianamede Delil Olarak Kullan\u0131lan Veriler<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>M\u0130T Bylock tespit raporu<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Yarg\u0131lama A\u015famas\u0131nda Tutuklaman\u0131n Devam\u0131na Karar Veren H\u00e2kim ve Savc\u0131lar<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>G\u00f6kalp G\u00d6K\u00c7\u00dc (32221) (\u0130ddianameyi yazan savc\u0131)<\/li>\n<li>Erg\u00fcn G\u00dc\u00c7L\u00dc (109889) (\u0130ddianameyi yazan savc\u0131)<\/li>\n<li>B\u00fclent DALKIRAN (40053)<\/li>\n<li>P\u0131nar GEZER ATANIAN (118965)<\/li>\n<li>Enver \u00dcST\u00dcN (165982)<\/li>\n<li>Kadri ARSLAN (122311)<\/li>\n<li>Cant\u00fcrk TA\u015eKIN (104927)<\/li>\n<li>Cem KARACA (43103)<\/li>\n<li>\u0130rfan \u015eANCI (119168)<\/li>\n<li>Cihan YILMAZ (120633)<\/li>\n<li>Erkan \u00d6ZKAYA (41968)<\/li>\n<li>G\u00f6kberk SUNAL (42437)<\/li>\n<li>Mustafa Kemal TURGUT (104771)<\/li>\n<li>Ali Deniz TANRIVERD\u0130 (97947)<\/li>\n<li>Mehmet Re\u015fat YAVUZ (101546)<\/li>\n<li>Ayhan G\u00dcLDALI (38649)<\/li>\n<li>Veli SAN (38077)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>III. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>S\u00f6z konusu kararlar\u0131 incelemek \u00fczere Derne\u011fimizin bir \u00fcyesi bir raport\u00f6r olarak g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Raport\u00f6r g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7erir raporunu Kurulumuza sunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>Kurulumuz t\u00fcm \u00fcyeleri taraf\u0131ndan sunulan rapor ve ba\u015fvurucuya ait ibraz edilmi\u015f\u00a0<strong>\u00a02017 y\u0131l\u0131na ait (23) adet ve 2018 y\u0131l\u0131na ait (8) adet olmak \u00fczere toplam (31)\u00a0<\/strong>karar\/talep incelenerek, T.C. Anayasas\u0131 ve ceza mevzuat\u0131, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin taraf oldu\u011fu uluslararas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi ve Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler ilgili komite ve komisyon kararlar\u0131 ile Avrupa Konseyi, Avrupa Birli\u011fi ve Venedik Komisyonu\u2019nun T\u00fcrk yarg\u0131 sistemi, mahkemelerin i\u015fleyi\u015fi, temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin ihlaline ili\u015fkin rapor ve g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri do\u011frultusunda de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Ba\u015fvurucu T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetler b\u00fcnyesinde g\u00f6rev yaparken; TSK\u2019 n\u0131n su\u00e7 duyurusu \u00fczerine, hakk\u0131nda \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda tutuklanm\u0131\u015f ve uzun s\u00fcre tutuklu kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n tutuklanmas\u0131na ve h\u00fck\u00fcm almas\u0131na gerek\u00e7e olan tek delil ise M\u0130T Bylock tespit raporudur.<\/p>\n<p><strong>KARARLARDA SOMUT VE HUKUKEN KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R B\u0130R DEL\u0130L BULUNUP BULUNMADI\u011eINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N \u0130NCELEME<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Kurulumuza sunulan h\u00e2kimlik (veya mahkeme) kararlar\u0131 incelendi\u011finde, Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun 100. maddesinde tutuklamaya ili\u015fkin \u015fartlar\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011funa dair karar\u0131 okuyan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiyi ikna edebilecek bir delil de\u011ferlendirilmesi yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; sadece kanunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 ifadelerin tekrar\u0131yla yetinildi\u011fi; kararda yer almayan ancak dosyada var oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclebilecek delillerin hukukili\u011fi noktas\u0131nda bir de\u011ferlendirme ve inceleme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz ve tahliye talep dilek\u00e7elerinde \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hususlar\u0131n neden kabul edilmedi\u011fi konusunda hi\u00e7bir de\u011ferlendirmeye yer verilmedi\u011fi; A\u0130HM\u2019in 5. madde kapsam\u0131ndaki i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda belirlenen delil ve delil de\u011ferlendirme kriterlerinin kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Anayasa ve uluslararas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerle teminat alt\u0131na al\u0131nan haklar\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n geriye d\u00f6n\u00fck ve ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k temelli olarak ki\u015fi aleyhine su\u00e7lama delili olarak kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kurulumuz taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6zlemlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>KARARLARIN GEREK\u00c7EL\u0130 OLUP OLMADI\u011eI HUSUSUNDA YAPILAN \u0130NCELEME<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 141. maddesi ile emredilen ve CMK\u2019n\u0131n 34. maddesinde tekrarlanan ve uluslararas\u0131 insan haklar\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan, mahkeme ve h\u00e2kimlik kararlar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7eli olmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; \u00a0sebep-sonu\u00e7 ili\u015fkisi tesis edilmedi\u011fi, s\u00f6z konusu kararlarda sadece yasa maddelerinde yer alan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerin tekrar edildi\u011fi, kararlarda bireyselle\u015ftirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck-orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k-gereklilik gibi k\u0131staslar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucunun karara kar\u015f\u0131 etkin bir itiraz hakk\u0131 kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlendi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>Ba\u015fvurucu aleyhine gerek tutuklama talep yaz\u0131s\u0131 ve tutuklama karar\u0131nda, gerek iddianamede ve gerekse gerek\u00e7eli mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilen ve kullan\u0131lan bilgi ve belgelerin ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 ve tutuklanmas\u0131na dayanak olarak kullan\u0131lan darbeye te\u015febb\u00fcs ve silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7lamas\u0131n\u0131 ispatlamaya, tutuklanmas\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 ve makul g\u00f6stermeye yeterli \u00f6nem ve de\u011ferde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; bu verilerin yukar\u0131da isimleri yaz\u0131l\u0131 h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan keyfi yorumlamaya tabi tutulup, bunlardan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayacak \u00f6nem ve a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kta s\u00fcbjektif sonu\u00e7lara var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7lar ile bunlara dayanak olarak kullan\u0131lan veriler aras\u0131nda mant\u0131k ve hukuk ilkeleri ile uyumlu, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fileri ikna edebilecek mahiyette bir ba\u011flant\u0131 kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kurulumuzca g\u00f6zlemlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Bu haliyle s\u00f6z konusu kararlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011funun kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p><strong>KARARLARI VEREN H\u00c2K\u0130M VE SAVCILARIN TARAFSIZLI\u011eINA VE BA\u011eIMSIZLI\u011eINA DA\u0130R DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RMELER<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>2014 sonras\u0131 T\u00fcrk yarg\u0131 sisteminin ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve hakimlik-savc\u0131l\u0131k teminat\u0131na dair d\u00fczenlenen\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.avrupa.info.tr\/tr\/ilerleme-raporlari-744\">AB \u0130lerleme Raporlar\u0131<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.avrupa.info.tr\/tr\/ilerleme-raporlari-744\">BM Komite ve Komisyon Kararlar\u0131<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.venice.coe.int\/webforms\/documents\/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2016)037-e\">Venedik Komisyonu Karar\u0131<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-192804%22]}\">A\u0130HM\u00a0<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-192804%22]}\">i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/medelnet.eu\/index.php\/situation-in-turkey\">MEDEL ve di\u011fer Avrupa hakim ve savc\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fctleri raporlar<\/a>\u0131, uluslararas\u0131\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/turkeytribunal.com\/the-reports\/\">insan haklar\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fctleri rapor<\/a>\u00a0ve de\u011ferlendirmeleri birlikte incelendi\u011finde, yarg\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerinde siyasetin yo\u011fun bir etkisinin oldu\u011fu, hakim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n atama, nakil ve yetkilendirilmelerinin \u015feffaf ve denetlenebilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, iktidar aleyhine karar veren hakim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n g\u00f6rev yerlerinin de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fi, haklar\u0131nda disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya ihra\u00e7lar\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi; yap\u0131lan yasal d\u00fczenlemeler ile yarg\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fleyi\u015fine do\u011frudan m\u00fcdahale edildi\u011fi, siyasi y\u00f6n\u00fc bulunan soru\u015fturma ve yarg\u0131lamalarda A\u0130HM i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ile somutla\u015fan ve \u00e7er\u00e7evesi \u00e7izilen ilke ve usullere riayet edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Hukuka uygunlu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 delillere dayal\u0131 olarak, gerek\u00e7esiz \u015fekilde verilen tutuklama ve tutukluluk devam kararlar\u0131 ve bu kararlar neticesinde uzunca s\u00fcre ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklu kalmas\u0131 ile kararda yer verilen \u00f6n kabuller birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde s\u00f6z konusu yarg\u0131 mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nyarg\u0131l\u0131, tarafl\u0131 ve ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k temelli bir yakla\u015f\u0131m sergiledikleri konusunda taraf\u0131m\u0131zda kuvvetli bir \u015f\u00fcphe olu\u015fmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>Verilen kararlar\u0131n Ceza ve Ceza Yarg\u0131lama Hukukunun temel ilkelerine tamamen ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, karar veren h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n verdikleri kararlarda ba\u015fvurucuya atfedilen su\u00e7un yasal \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair de\u011ferlendirmelerden ziyade, ba\u015fvurucunun ideolojisini, dini g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc, ait oldu\u011fu sosyal grubu, \u0131rk\u0131n\u0131 ve\/ya siyasi tercihlerini g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylece yarg\u0131\u00e7lar\u0131n objektif ve s\u00fcbjektif ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, savc\u0131lar\u0131n ise tarafs\u0131zl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 kaybettikleri konusunda Kurulumuzda kanaat olu\u015fmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV. KARAR VERENLER\u0130N HUKUK\u0130 SORUMLULU\u011eUNUN DE\u011eERLED\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130 VE SONU\u00c7:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ba\u015fvurucunun talebi do\u011frultusunda yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda, s\u00f6z konusu kararlar\u0131n uluslararas\u0131 insan haklar\u0131 hukuku \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde kabul edilen ilke ve gereklilikleri kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle s\u00f6z konusu kararlar\u0131n hukuken me\u015fru ve kabul edilebilir, sonu\u00e7 do\u011furacak nitelikte olmad\u0131klar\u0131 Kurulumuzca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Yukar\u0131da yer verilen gerek\u00e7eler ve kabule g\u00f6re, soru\u015fturma ve\/ya yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda Ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131na ve\/ya tutuklulu\u011funun devam\u0131na karar veren h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n muhtemel hukuk\u00ee sorumluluklar\u0131 Kurulumuzca a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gibi tespit edilmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ceza Hukuku sorumlulu\u011fu:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yukar\u0131da isimleri yaz\u0131l\u0131 yarg\u0131 mensubu h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 y\u00f6ntemlerle, hukuken ge\u00e7erli bir delil olmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve gerek\u00e7esiz tutuklama karar\u0131 vermek ve\/ya devam ettirmek suretiyle TCK\u2019nun 37. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla TCK\u2019nun 109\/1; 109\/2; 109\/3-b, c; 109\/4 maddelerine temas eden\u00a0<strong>K\u0130\u015e\u0130Y\u0130 H\u00dcR\u0130YET\u0130NDEN YOKSUN KILMA<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>SU\u00c7U<\/strong>\u00a0nedeniyle soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p>Ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n, ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7unu; siyasal saiklerle ve ma\u011fdurla birlikte toplumun bir kesimine kar\u015f\u0131 bir plan do\u011frultusunda sistemli olarak i\u015flediklerine dair hakl\u0131 nedenlerin bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda TCK\u2019nun 77\/1-d maddesine temas eden\u00a0<strong>\u0130NSANLI\u011eA KAR\u015eI SU\u00c7<\/strong>\u00a0ba\u011flam\u0131nda soru\u015fturulmalar\u0131 gerekti\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p>Dosya ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015ftu\u011fu takdirde adlar\u0131 ge\u00e7en yarg\u0131 mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali (TCK md. 116)<\/li>\n<li>Dilek\u00e7e hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesi (TCK md. 121)<\/li>\n<li>Nefret ve ay\u0131r\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k (TCK md. 122)<\/li>\n<li>Haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal (TCK md. 132)<\/li>\n<li>\u00d6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal (TCK md. 134)<\/li>\n<li>Verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme (TCK md. 136)<\/li>\n<li>Verileri yok etmeme (TCK md. 138)<\/li>\n<li>Resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik (TCK md. 204)<\/li>\n<li>Resm\u00ee belgenin d\u00fczenlenmesinde yalan beyan (TCK md. 206)<\/li>\n<li>G\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma (TCK md. 257)<\/li>\n<li>Ki\u015filerin mallar\u0131 \u00fczerinde usuls\u00fcz tasarruf (TCK MAD md. DE 261)<\/li>\n<li>Su\u00e7 uydurma (TCK md. 271)<\/li>\n<li>Yarg\u0131 g\u00f6revi yapan\u0131, bilirki\u015fiyi veya tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 etkilemeye te\u015febb\u00fcs (TCK md. 277)<\/li>\n<li>Su\u00e7 delillerini yok etme, gizleme veya de\u011fi\u015ftirme (TCK md. 281)<\/li>\n<li>Adil yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 etkilemeye te\u015febb\u00fcs (TCK md. 288)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan sorumlu olabilecekleri,<\/p>\n<p><strong>Disiplin Hukuku sorumlulu\u011fu:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Anayasa ve uluslararas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerden kaynakl\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini yerine getirmeyen yukar\u0131da isimleri yaz\u0131l\u0131 h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda H\u00e2kimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan meslekten ihra\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 konu alan bir disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00d6zel Hukuk sorumlulu\u011fu:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ba\u015fvurucunun u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddi ve manevi zararlar\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda Devlet aleyhine ulusal ve uluslararas\u0131 yarg\u0131 mercileri nezdinde a\u00e7\u0131lacak davalar sonucunda \u00f6denmesi kuvvetle muhtemel tazminat miktarlar\u0131ndan yukar\u0131da isimleri ge\u00e7en h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n r\u00fccuen sorumlu tutulmalar\u0131 gerekti\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p>Sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Vard\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z sonuca, isimleri yaz\u0131l\u0131 h\u00e2kim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n g\u0131yab\u0131nda var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>S\u00f6z konusu yarg\u0131 mensuplar\u0131, kendileri veya temsilcileri vas\u0131tas\u0131yla de\u011ferlendirmelerimize ve vard\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z sonuca itiraz etme hakk\u0131na sahiptirler.<\/p>\n<p>B\u00f6yle bir itiraz ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finde, yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131 ve sunulan bilgi ve belgeler kamuoyu ile payla\u015f\u0131lacak ve yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z de\u011ferlendirme ve tespitler yeniden g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irilerek tamamen veya k\u0131smen de\u011fi\u015ftirilebilecektir.<\/p>\n<p>Kamuoyuna sayg\u0131yla duyurulur.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00dcYE\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00dcYE\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00dcYE<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Almanya K\u00f6ln merkezli olarak kurulan ve temel hak ihlallerinin \u00f6nlenmesi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u00f6nemli faaliyetlere imza atan CrossBorderJurists Derne\u011fi, b\u00fcnyesinde kurdu\u011fu Hukuksuzluklar\u0131 Ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve Analiz Kurulu \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde, hakim, savc\u0131 ve mahkeme kararlar\u0131 ile ma\u011fdur olmu\u015f ki\u015filerin ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 inceleyerek tespitlerini kamuoyu ile payla\u015f\u0131yor. Son olarak, subay olan ve kimlik bilgileri gizli tutulan Ba\u015fvurucu (47)\u2019nin ba\u015fvurusu ile ilgili de\u011ferlendirmelerine [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8037,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[81,170],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8035"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8035"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8035\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8038,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8035\/revisions\/8038"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8037"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8035"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8035"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8035"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}