{"id":7503,"date":"2022-06-05T07:19:26","date_gmt":"2022-06-05T07:19:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/?p=7503"},"modified":"2022-06-05T07:19:26","modified_gmt":"2022-06-05T07:19:26","slug":"balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/","title":{"rendered":"BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Bu makalede; Anayasa Mahkemesinin (AYM), Balyoz karar\u0131nda\u00a0<em>\u201cgerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131\u201d, \u201csilahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi\u201d<\/em>\u00a0ve\u00a0<em>\u201c\u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama\u201d<\/em>\u00a0ilkelerini tatbik \u015fekli ve bu ilkeleri Bylock dosyalar\u0131nda unutmak suretiyle uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u00a0<em>\u201cd\u00fc\u015fman ceza hukuku\u201d<\/em>\u00a0anlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Balyoz\u2019da Esasl\u0131 Olmayan Hatalar da \u0130hlal Sebebidir<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>AYM, Balyoz karar\u0131 olarak bilinen Sencer Ba\u015fat ve Di\u011ferleri ba\u015fvurusunda;[1] adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bir unsuru olan gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u015fu gerek\u00e7eyle ihlal edildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir; \u201cs<em>omut ba\u015fvuruda, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin h\u00fckme esas ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u2026dijital dok\u00fcmanlar\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddialar ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, savunmalarda bulunulmu\u015ftur. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi bu \u00e7eli\u015fkilerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015f, bir k\u0131s\u0131m zaman \u00e7eli\u015fkilerinin dava konusu belgelerin san\u0131klarca g\u00fcncellenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle olu\u015fmu\u015f olabilece\u011fi ihtimaline, bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n bizzat san\u0131klarca daha sonra yarg\u0131lanma ihtimallerine kar\u015f\u0131n bilin\u00e7li olarak olu\u015fturulmu\u015f olabilece\u011fi\u00a0<strong>ihtimaline dayand\u0131rm\u0131\u015f<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>ve bu t\u00fcr belgelerin mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 belgeler olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, say\u0131ca fazla olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve karar\u0131n sonucunu etkileyecek nitelikte olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.\u00a0<\/strong>Buna kar\u015f\u0131n, Amerikan\u00a0Forensic\u00a0Labratory\u00a0isimli firman\u0131n bilirki\u015fi raporu \u00f6rne\u011finde oldu\u011fu gibi davan\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131 etkileyecek baz\u0131 savunma delillerine ise gerek\u00e7eli kararda hi\u00e7 de\u011finilmemi\u015f, baz\u0131 raporlara neden itibar edilmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya da yer verilmemi\u015ftir (<\/em>\u00a7 60)<\/p>\n<p><em>Savunmalar\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan ve dijital verilerin g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fine ili\u015fkin ciddi ku\u015fkular uyanmas\u0131na neden olan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 ve uzman m\u00fctalaalar\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde, dijital veri ve i\u00e7eriklerine dayanan \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi, adalet gereksinimini giderecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fc ve nitelikte, yeterli ve makul olarak de\u011ferlendirilemez. Bu sebeple \u201cgerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131\u201d ihlal edilmi\u015ftir\u00a0<\/em><em>(<\/em>\u00a7 61)<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Yani AYM\u2019ye g\u00f6re; ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n sunduklar\u0131 bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 ve uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r ve dijital verilerin g\u00fcvenirlili\u011fine ili\u015fkin ciddi \u015f\u00fcphe sebepleri vard\u0131r. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi bunlar\u0131\u00a0<em>\u201ckarar\u0131n sonucunu etkileyecek\u201d\u00a0<\/em>nitelikte, yani\u00a0<em>\u201cesasl\u0131 olmayan hatalar\u201d<\/em>\u00a0olarak kabul etse de, b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde dijital veri ve i\u00e7eriklerine dayanan gerek\u00e7eli karar \u015f\u00fcphe sebeplerini giderecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fc ve yeterlilikte de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma haklar\u0131 ihlal edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bylock\u2019taki Hatalar Esasl\u0131 De\u011fildir<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Balyoz karar\u0131nda, dijital veriler aras\u0131nda esasl\u0131 olmayan farkl\u0131l\u0131klar bulundu\u011funa ve bunlar\u0131n sonucu etkilemeyece\u011fine ili\u015fkin ilk derece mahkemesinin gerek\u00e7esine itibar etmeyen AYM, Bylock ile ilgili verdi\u011fi Ferhat Kara karar\u0131nda[2] ise \u015funlar\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir;\u00a0<em>\u201c<\/em><em>ba\u015fvurucu, kendisi hakk\u0131ndaki baz\u0131 ByLock verilerinde \u00e7eli\u015fkiler bulundu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. An\u0131lan iddian\u0131n de\u011ferlendirmesinde -somut ba\u015fvurudan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak- ByLock sunucusundaki veriler ile CGNAT kay\u0131tlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin verilerin tamam\u0131n\u0131n elde edilemedi\u011finin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ByLock veri taban\u0131ndan elde edilen verilerin kurtar\u0131lma ve \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenebilme oranlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ki\u015filerle ilgili veriler aras\u0131nda esasl\u0131 olmayan farkl\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr\u00a0<\/em>(\u00a7 162).<\/p>\n<p><em>\u2026Hem ByLock veri taban\u0131nda bulunan ve ba\u015fvurucuyla e\u015fle\u015ftirilen user-ID\u2019ye ba\u011fl\u0131 log kay\u0131tlar\u0131yla CGNAT kay\u0131tlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda hem de bu user-ID\u2019ye ba\u011fl\u0131 farkl\u0131 alt tablolarda yer alan baz\u0131 veriler aras\u0131nda -verilerin tam olarak elde edilememesinden kaynakl\u0131- esasl\u0131 olmayan farkl\u0131lar\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 yukar\u0131da var\u0131lan sonucun aksi y\u00f6nde bir karar verilmesine etkisi bulunmamaktad\u0131r\u00a0<\/em>(\u00a7 163).<\/p>\n<p>Yani AYM; Bylock veri taban\u0131ndaki ba\u015fvurucuyla e\u015fle\u015ftirilen user-ID\u2019ye ba\u011fl\u0131 log kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile CGNAT kay\u0131tlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda ve bu user-ID\u2019ye ba\u011fl\u0131 farkl\u0131 alt tablolarda yer alan baz\u0131 veriler aras\u0131nda farkl\u0131lar\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, ancak ne hikmetse bunlar\u0131n\u00a0<em>\u201cesasl\u0131 olmayan farkl\u0131l\u0131klar\u201d<\/em>\u00a0oldu\u011funu ve bunun da\u00a0<em>\u201cverilerin tam olarak elde edilememesinden\u201d<\/em>\u00a0kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 itiraf etmi\u015ftir. Yani, dijital delilin s\u0131hhatini etkileyen ve tabiri caizse bu delili\u00a0<em>\u201c\u00e7\u00f6p yapan\u201d<\/em>\u00a0hususlar AYM\u2019ye g\u00f6re\u00a0<em>\u201cesasl\u0131 olmayan hatad\u0131r\u201d<\/em>\u00a0ve bu hata da fazla abart\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r! Zira veriler tam olarak elde edilememi\u015ftir, elde edilebilse zaten bu hatalar olmayacakt\u0131r!<\/p>\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, AYM bu de\u011ferlendirmeyi yaparken her hangi bir bilirki\u015fi raporu ya da uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne de dayanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle, \u00e7ok hassas ve d\u0131\u015f m\u00fcdahaleye a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131 nedeniyle delil g\u00fcc\u00fc \u00e7ok zay\u0131f olan dijital delillerle ilgili AYM,\u00a0<em>\u201coturdu\u011fu yerden\u201d<\/em>\u00a0esasl\u0131 olmayan hata gibi bir kavram uydurmu\u015f ve bu deliller \u00fczerinde yap\u0131labilecek manip\u00fclasyonlara sonuna kadar kap\u0131y\u0131 aralam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. O zaman sormak gerekmez mi esasl\u0131 olmayan hata ne demektir? Hangi hatalar AYM\u2019ye g\u00f6re esasl\u0131d\u0131r? Dijital veri ve delillerle ilgili AYM\u2019nin uzmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya da bilgisi nedir ki, bilirki\u015fi incelemesi dahi yap\u0131lamam\u0131\u015f bu dosyada b\u00f6yle ahkam kesebilmi\u015ftir?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Dijital Delil de Esasl\u0131\/Esasl\u0131 Olmayan Hata Ayr\u0131m\u0131 Yap\u0131lamaz<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dijital veriler, i\u00e7 ve d\u0131\u015f b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc tamamlamas\u0131 ve birbirlerini matematiksel olarak do\u011frulamas\u0131 gereken verilerdir. Verilerden bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n olmamas\u0131 veya farkl\u0131 \u015fekillerde kaydedilmesi, veriler aras\u0131ndaki b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve verilerin \u00e7eli\u015fki nedeniyle farkl\u0131l\u0131k arz etti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelir. Dijital veriler 0 ve 1 olarak ifade edilebilecek nitelikte iki karakterden ibaret olmalar\u0131 sebebiyle veriler aras\u0131nda farkl\u0131l\u0131ktan bahsedilemez. Bylock dosyalar\u0131na dahil edilen 5 t\u00fcr veri ve kay\u0131t vard\u0131r ki, bunlar\u0131n birbirlerini tamamlamas\u0131 ve do\u011frulamas\u0131 \u015fartt\u0131r (GPRS kay\u0131tlar\u0131, CGNAT kay\u0131tlar\u0131, HTS, H\u0130S kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ve TDT). Bunlardan d\u00f6rd\u00fc BTK kay\u0131tlar\u0131na (GPRS kay\u0131tlar\u0131, CGNAT kay\u0131tlar\u0131, HTS ve H\u0130S kay\u0131tlar\u0131), biri de Bylock serverinden geldi\u011fi iddia ve kabul edilen TDT\u2019deki IP\u2019lere ili\u015fkindir. Bu kay\u0131t ve verilerin delil olarak kabul\u00fc; IP, IP bloklar\u0131, ba\u011flanma s\u00fcreleri, ba\u011flanma zamanlar\u0131, ayn\u0131 zaman diliminde tek hareketle yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken kay\u0131tlar ve daha onlarca noktan\u0131n birbirini do\u011frulamas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130\u015fin teknik boyutu b\u00f6yledir ve b\u0131rak\u0131n AYM karar\u0131nda yer verildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle User-ID\u2019ye ait log kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile CGNAT kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ve alt tablolardaki veriler aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7ok say\u0131daki hatay\u0131,\u00a0<em>\u201ctek bir harf ya da rakam\u201d<\/em>\u00a0hatas\u0131 dahi, o delilin yarg\u0131lamada kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na engeldir. Balyozda\u00a0<em>\u201charflerin karakter farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u201d<\/em>\u00a0bile ihlal gerek\u00e7esi yapan AYM, Bylock\u2019la ilgili en temel veri tutars\u0131zl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmezden gelmi\u015ftir. Acaba, Bylock\u2019la ilgili bu kadar tutars\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraf eden AYM i\u00e7in daha hangi tutars\u0131zl\u0131klar olmal\u0131d\u0131r ki, Bylock\u2019u delil kabul etmesin?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Balyoz\u2019da, Sunulan Rapor ve Uzman G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerinin Dikkate Al\u0131nmamas\u0131 \u0130hlal Sebebidir<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>AYM, Balyoz\u2019da savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilirki\u015fi raporuna itibar edilip; san\u0131klar\u0131n sunduklar\u0131 uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri ve raporlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131n\u0131 \u015fu gerek\u00e7eyle ihlal sebebi saym\u0131\u015ft\u0131r; \u201c<em>dijital delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesine ili\u015fkin \u015fikayetler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n sunduklar\u0131 bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 ve uzman m\u00fctalaalar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince kabul edilmemesi ve bu konularda Mahkemece bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 yolundaki taleplerinin de yetersiz gerek\u00e7elerle reddedilmesi, \u201cgerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131na\u201d ve \u201csilahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi\u201d ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131\u00a0<\/em><em>oldu\u011fundan, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ihlal edilmi\u015ftir<\/em>\u00a0(\u00a7 72).<\/p>\n<p>Ancak Ayn\u0131 AYM, Bylock yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131nda insanlar\u0131n mahkemelerden defalarca talep etmesine ra\u011fmen, b\u0131rak\u0131n Ankara C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131ndaki dijital materyalin getirtilmesini, insanlar\u0131n kendi \u00e7abalar\u0131yla ve \u00f6zellikle b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi a\u015famas\u0131nda kendi imkanlar\u0131yla al\u0131p dosyaya sunduklar\u0131 ve hemen hemen hepsinde verilerin ki\u015filerle e\u015fle\u015fmedi\u011fi tespiti yap\u0131lan bu raporlar\u0131 BAM ve Yarg\u0131tay gibi g\u00f6rmezden gelmi\u015f ve ilave rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131 ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131 yok saym\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Balyoz\u2019da Bilirki\u015fi \u0130ncelemesi Yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 Talebinin Reddi \u0130hlal Sebebidir<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>AYM, Balyozda \u015fu gerek\u00e7eyle ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bilirki\u015fi inceleme yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinin reddini ihlal sebebi kabul etmi\u015ftir;\u00a0<em>\u201c<\/em><em>\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan esasa ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirmeler yap\u0131l\u0131rken Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan sunulan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131n\u0131n belirleyici bir etkisi olmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle somut davada \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi, yaln\u0131zca Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan sunulan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131na itibar etmi\u015f, bu raporlara kar\u015f\u0131n ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olarak sunduklar\u0131 bilirki\u015fi rapor ve uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri ise dikkate al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n,\u00a0mahkumiyet\u00a0karar\u0131n\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olan dijital verilerin ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmek \u00fczere mahkemenin bilirki\u015fi heyeti tayin etmesi ve rapor ald\u0131rmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki taleplerini de yeterli olmayan gerek\u00e7e ile reddetmi\u015ftir\u00a0<\/em><em>(<\/em><em>\u00a7 70).<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>B\u00f6ylece ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n, haklar\u0131nda y\u00f6neltilen su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olan delillere kar\u015f\u0131 kovu\u015fturman\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesini isteme haklar\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n, maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak \u201csilahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi\u201d ilkesi ihlal edilmi\u015ftir\u00a0<\/em><em>(<\/em><em>\u00a7 71).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Bylock\u2019ta ise bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyen AYM;\u00a0<em>\u201cuser-ID\u2019ye ba\u011fl\u0131 kurtar\u0131labilen t\u00fcm di\u011fer verilere ByLock Tespit ve De\u011ferlendirme Tutana\u011f\u0131\u2019nda yer verildi\u011fi ve somut olayda bu verilerin ByLock kullan\u0131m\u0131 hususunda herhangi bir \u015f\u00fcphe<\/em><em>\u00a0olu\u015fturmayacak \u015fekilde birbirini do\u011frulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u201d<\/em>\u00a0belirtmi\u015ftir.[3] Bu de\u011ferlendirmeyi de daha \u00f6nce verdi\u011fi Adnan \u015een karar\u0131na[4] atfen yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak, Adnan \u015een karar\u0131ndaki bu de\u011ferlendirme sadece \u201c1658 user-ID numaras\u0131\u201d ile ilgilidir. Yani, ba\u015fvuruyu reddederken g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi gerek\u00e7e t\u00fcm dosyalar i\u00e7in de\u011fil, 1658 user-ID numaras\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Fakat sonraki tarihli \u00a0ba\u015fvuruyu reddederken, sanki b\u00f6yle teknik bir veri var ve Bylock\u2019taki t\u00fcm veriler bir birini do\u011fruluyormu\u015f gibi \u201calg\u0131\u201d olu\u015fturmu\u015ftur. O zaman sormak gerekmez mi, t\u00fcm veriler birbirini do\u011fruluyorsa ve bu nedenle bilirki\u015fi incelemesine gerek yoksa, yukar\u0131da uydurdu\u011funuz \u201cesasl\u0131 olamayan hatalar\u201d nereye konulacakt\u0131r? Acaba, itiraf etti\u011finiz bu hatalar nereden kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r? Tamamen say\u0131sal verilerden olu\u015fan dijital delillerle ilgili neden b\u00f6yle bir hata vard\u0131r? Sadece bu ifade bile Bylock verilerinin orijinal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bozuk oldu\u011funun ve yarg\u0131lamada kullan\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ispat\u0131 de\u011fil midir?<\/p>\n<p>K\u0131saca AYM, daha \u00f6nce uydurdu\u011fu bir yalana kendisi de inanm\u0131\u015f ve bunu da kimsenin anlamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek karar\u0131na yazabilmi\u015ftir. AYM\u2019nin durumu;\u00a0<em>\u201c<\/em><em>g\u00f6z\u00fcndeki merte\u011fi g\u00f6rmeyip, elin\u00a0g\u00f6z\u00fcndeki\u00a0\u00e7\u00f6p\u00fc g\u00f6rmekten\u201d\u00a0<\/em>farks\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p><strong>AYM, Bylock Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 Reddetmek \u0130\u00e7in Her Yolu Denemektedir<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>AYM, Bylock konusunda ihlal karar\u0131 vermemek i\u00e7in her yolu denemekte ve tabiri caizse atmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takla kalmamaktad\u0131r! \u00a0Zira Ferhat Kara karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Mahk\u00fbmiyetine gerek\u00e7e yap\u0131lan ByLock verilerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 y\u00f6ntemlerle elde edildi\u011fini,<\/li>\n<li>Bu verilerin ger\u00e7ekli\u011fine ve g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u015f\u00fcpheler bulundu\u011funu ve bu nedenle de yarg\u0131lamada kullan\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/li>\n<li>ByLock Tespit ve De\u011ferlendirme Tutana\u011f\u0131 ile CGNAT kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda belirtilen veriler aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fkiler oldu\u011funu,<\/li>\n<li>Her iki belgede ByLock sistemine ba\u011flan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair ilk ve son online tarihlerine ili\u015fkin verilerin birbirini tutmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/li>\n<li>ByLock Tespit ve De\u011ferlendirme Tutana\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011finde yer alan ID\u2019ye ait mesaj, e-posta, arama-aranma kay\u0131tlar\u0131na dair tarih ve saat bilgilerinin CGNAT kay\u0131tlar\u0131yla uyumlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/li>\n<li>Listede olmayan ID\u2019lerle arama kay\u0131tlar\u0131 oldu\u011funa dair tespitlere yer verildi\u011fini,<\/li>\n<li>ByLock sunucusuna ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen IP\u2019lerden birinin o tarihte sunucuya tahsis edilmedi\u011fini,<\/li>\n<li>NAT teknolojisi gere\u011fi s\u00fcrekli ayn\u0131 dinamik IP\u2019nin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak kendisinin uzun s\u00fcre ayn\u0131 IP ile ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitinde bulunuldu\u011funu, bu nedenlerle ByLock kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin tespitlerin ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir ( 114).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Bu iddialar\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren AYM ise \u015funlar\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir;\u00a0<strong><em><u>\u201cBa\u015fvurucu \u2026bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 kendisiyle ilgili yarg\u0131lamada ByLock verileri ba\u011flam\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 somut sorunlar kapsam\u0131nda de\u011fil genel olarak ByLock verilerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak elde edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda dile getirmi\u015ftir.<\/u><\/em><\/strong><em>\u00a0Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle ba\u015fvurucunun ByLock verilerinin kendisiyle ilgili yarg\u0131lamada kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 somut sorunlar\u0131 derece mahkemeleri \u00f6n\u00fcnde dile getirip bu kapsamda gerekli ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve incelemelerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fine ancak derece mahkemelerinden yan\u0131t alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir bilgi ve belge bulunmamaktad\u0131r.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0(\u00a7 171).<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6ncelikle; AYM\u2019nin, ba\u015fvurucunun ileri s\u00fcrmedi dedi\u011fi husus, ilk derece mahkemesinin resen dikkate almas\u0131 gereken bir husustur. Kald\u0131 ki ba\u015fvurucu bu hususu ve her \u00e7eli\u015fkiyi da dile getirmi\u015ftir. Ancak, ba\u015fvuruyu reddetmeye niyetli olan AYM,\u00a0<em>\u201co hususu \u015fu ba\u015fl\u0131kta de\u011fil, bu ba\u015fl\u0131kta dile getirmi\u015fsin\u201d<\/em>\u00a0demi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu o ba\u015fl\u0131kta dile getirse, o zaman da ba\u015fka bir gerek\u00e7eyle ba\u015fvuruyu reddedecektir.<\/p>\n<p>Balyoz da\u00a0<em>\u201csinekten ya\u011f\u201d<\/em>\u00a0\u00e7\u0131kar\u0131rcas\u0131na her hususu ihlal gerek\u00e7esi yapan AYM;\u00a0<strong><em>\u201c<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 kendisiyle ilgili yarg\u0131lamada ByLock verileri ba\u011flam\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 somut sorunlar kapsam\u0131nda de\u011fil genel olarak ByLock verilerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak elde edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda dile getirmi\u015ftir\u201d<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0demek suretiyle, ba\u015fvurucunun kendisiyle ilgili dile getirdi\u011fi hususlar\u0131n Bylock verilerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ayn\u0131 oldu\u011funun, yani ba\u015fvurucunun Bylock nedeniyle ba\u015fvuru yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n fark\u0131nda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koymu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p><strong>AYM\u2019nin Hakan Evren Karar\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>AYM\u2019nin Bylock\u2019a bak\u0131\u015f\u0131 budur ve Bylock\u2019u silahl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011finin en \u00f6nemli delili kabul etmektedir. AYM\u2019nin Harun Evren karar\u0131n\u0131 da bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar ba\u011flam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirmek gerekir. Bu karar\u0131n en \u00f6nemli yan\u0131 AYM\u2019nin \u00e7ifte standard\u0131 ve ikiy\u00fczl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00f6stermesidir. Yukar\u0131daki kararlarda yer verilen veri tutars\u0131zl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve Bylock\u2019un elde edili\u015f y\u00f6ntemiyle ilgili onlarca hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6rmezden gelen AYM, bunlar yan\u0131nda \u201cesamesi bile okunmayacak\u201d \u00e7ok basit hususlar\u0131 ihlal gerek\u00e7esi yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. AYM\u2019nin s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131 bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle bir yenilik i\u00e7ermemektedir ve ba\u015fvurucu \u00f6zelinde al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Zira Bylock tespit ve de\u011ferlendirme tutana\u011f\u0131nda bile ilgili ID numaras\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya ait oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin uyduruk bir polis g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc dahi yoktur. Bylock ID\u2019si, kendisine ait ADSL numaras\u0131 \u00fczerinden kullan\u0131m tespiti var denilerek ba\u015fvurucuya yamanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu da, ADSL hatt\u0131na hacklenmek suretiyle girilmi\u015f olabilece\u011fini belirterek ID\u2019ye eklenen ki\u015filerin dinlenmesini istemi\u015ftir. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi ise hi\u00e7bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi CGNAT kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131 getirtme zahmetine dahi girmemi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca, ba\u015fvurucunun Bank Asya\u2019da sadece hesab\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 da mahkumiyete gerek\u00e7e yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. AYM, hesap hareketlerinin bile incelenmedi\u011fini belirterek, Bylock\u2019u dosyada belirleyici delil kabul etmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, bu belirleyici delil \u00fczerinde yeterli inceleme yap\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n eksiklik oldu\u011funu, ID\u2019nin ba\u015fvurucuya yamanmas\u0131ndaki belirsizlikler sebebiyle ID\u2019ye ekli ki\u015filerin de dinlenmesi gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle, karar\u0131n \u00e7o\u011fu dosyada uygulanabilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. K\u0131saca AYM, yerel mahkemeye;\u00a0<em>\u201csen de hi\u00e7bir \u015fey ara\u015ft\u0131rmam\u0131\u015fs\u0131n, en az\u0131ndan en temel hususlar\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r da \u00f6yle ceza ver\u201d<\/em>\u00a0demi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Bu karar\u0131n\u00a0<em>\u201cyeniden yarg\u0131lama\u201d<\/em>\u00a0sebebi say\u0131lacak bir taraf\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi AYM\u2019nin Bylock\u2019u\u00a0<em>\u201c\u00e7\u00f6pe att\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d<\/em>\u00a0\u015feklinde yorumlanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek bir yan\u0131 da yoktur. AYM, A\u0130HM\u2019den ihlal \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildi\u011fi Bylock\u2019la ilgili daha sonra ben de b\u00f6yle kararlar vermi\u015ftim demek i\u00e7in bu g\u00f6stermelik kararlar\u0131 vermektedir. Gelinen nokta itibariyle, AYM\u2019den adalet ya da hukuka d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f beklemek bir hayaldir. Hep s\u00f6yledi\u011fimiz gibi AYM, A\u0130HM \u00f6n\u00fcndeki engelden ba\u015fka bir \u015fey de\u011fildir. Verdi\u011fi kararlara bir anlam y\u00fcklemeye gerek yoktur. Zira sorunun kendisi \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm olamaz!<\/p>\n<p>[1] B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014.<\/p>\n<p>[2] B. No: 2018\/15231, 04\/6\/2020.<\/p>\n<p>[3] B. No: 2021\/50635, 26\/5\/2022.<\/p>\n<p>[4] B. No: 2018\/8903, 15\/4\/2021.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK! &nbsp; Bu makalede; Anayasa Mahkemesinin (AYM), Balyoz karar\u0131nda\u00a0\u201cgerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131\u201d, \u201csilahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi\u201d\u00a0ve\u00a0\u201c\u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama\u201d\u00a0ilkelerini tatbik \u015fekli ve bu ilkeleri Bylock dosyalar\u0131nda unutmak suretiyle uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u00a0\u201cd\u00fc\u015fman ceza hukuku\u201d\u00a0anlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Balyoz\u2019da Esasl\u0131 Olmayan Hatalar da \u0130hlal Sebebidir AYM, Balyoz karar\u0131 olarak bilinen Sencer Ba\u015fat ve Di\u011ferleri ba\u015fvurusunda;[1] adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bir unsuru olan gerek\u00e7eli karar [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":7504,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[71,72],"tags":[79,80],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK! - Hukuk Penceresi<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Hukuk Penceresi \/ Zul\u00fcm karanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0131\u015f\u0131k sa\u00e7an pencere\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK! - Hukuk Penceresi\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Hukuk Penceresi \/ Zul\u00fcm karanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0131\u015f\u0131k sa\u00e7an pencere\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Hukuk Penceresi\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/category\/Author\/Hukuk-Penceresi-100335678174866\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-05T07:19:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Ekran-Goruntusu-613-750x340-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"750\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"340\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"DR. G\u00d6KHAN G\u00dcNE\u015e\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@hukuk_penceresi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@hukuk_penceresi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Yazan:\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"DR. G\u00d6KHAN G\u00dcNE\u015e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"DR. G\u00d6KHAN G\u00dcNE\u015e\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d56de39d8adb1293087acc4353e263d4\"},\"headline\":\"BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK!\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-05T07:19:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-06-05T07:19:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/\"},\"wordCount\":2763,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"BYLOCK\",\"YARGIDA B\u0130RL\u0130K\"],\"articleSection\":[\"HABER DOSYASI\",\"Yarg\u0131da Birlik\"],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/\",\"name\":\"BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK! - Hukuk Penceresi\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-05T07:19:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-06-05T07:19:26+00:00\",\"description\":\"Hukuk Penceresi \/ Zul\u00fcm karanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0131\u015f\u0131k sa\u00e7an pencere\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Anasayfa\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK!\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/\",\"name\":\"Hukuk Penceresi\",\"description\":\"Zul\u00fcm karanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0131\u015f\u0131k sa\u00e7an pencere\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Hukuk Penceresi\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Adsiz-tasarim-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Adsiz-tasarim-1.png\",\"width\":800,\"height\":200,\"caption\":\"Hukuk Penceresi\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/category\/Author\/Hukuk-Penceresi-100335678174866\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hukuk_penceresi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d56de39d8adb1293087acc4353e263d4\",\"name\":\"DR. G\u00d6KHAN G\u00dcNE\u015e\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/4axv8SKg_400x400-150x150.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/4axv8SKg_400x400-150x150.jpeg\",\"caption\":\"DR. G\u00d6KHAN G\u00dcNE\u015e\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/author\/ibrahimsami\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK! - Hukuk Penceresi","description":"Hukuk Penceresi \/ Zul\u00fcm karanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0131\u015f\u0131k sa\u00e7an pencere","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK! - Hukuk Penceresi","og_description":"Hukuk Penceresi \/ Zul\u00fcm karanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0131\u015f\u0131k sa\u00e7an pencere","og_url":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/","og_site_name":"Hukuk Penceresi","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/category\/Author\/Hukuk-Penceresi-100335678174866\/","article_published_time":"2022-06-05T07:19:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":750,"height":340,"url":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Ekran-Goruntusu-613-750x340-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"DR. G\u00d6KHAN G\u00dcNE\u015e","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@hukuk_penceresi","twitter_site":"@hukuk_penceresi","twitter_misc":{"Yazan:":"DR. G\u00d6KHAN G\u00dcNE\u015e","Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"14 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/"},"author":{"name":"DR. G\u00d6KHAN G\u00dcNE\u015e","@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d56de39d8adb1293087acc4353e263d4"},"headline":"BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK!","datePublished":"2022-06-05T07:19:26+00:00","dateModified":"2022-06-05T07:19:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/"},"wordCount":2763,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#organization"},"keywords":["BYLOCK","YARGIDA B\u0130RL\u0130K"],"articleSection":["HABER DOSYASI","Yarg\u0131da Birlik"],"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/","url":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/","name":"BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK! - Hukuk Penceresi","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-06-05T07:19:26+00:00","dateModified":"2022-06-05T07:19:26+00:00","description":"Hukuk Penceresi \/ Zul\u00fcm karanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0131\u015f\u0131k sa\u00e7an pencere","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/balyozda-uygulanip-bylockta-unutulan-hukuk\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Anasayfa","item":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"BALYOZ\u2019DA UYGULANIP BYLOCK\u2019TA UNUTULAN HUKUK!"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/","name":"Hukuk Penceresi","description":"Zul\u00fcm karanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0131\u015f\u0131k sa\u00e7an pencere","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#organization","name":"Hukuk Penceresi","url":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Adsiz-tasarim-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Adsiz-tasarim-1.png","width":800,"height":200,"caption":"Hukuk Penceresi"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/category\/Author\/Hukuk-Penceresi-100335678174866\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/hukuk_penceresi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d56de39d8adb1293087acc4353e263d4","name":"DR. G\u00d6KHAN G\u00dcNE\u015e","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/4axv8SKg_400x400-150x150.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/4axv8SKg_400x400-150x150.jpeg","caption":"DR. G\u00d6KHAN G\u00dcNE\u015e"},"url":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/author\/ibrahimsami\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7503"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7503"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7503\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7505,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7503\/revisions\/7505"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukpenceresi.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}